Decision Maker: Council
Decision status: For Determination
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
(1) Subject to the
following amendment to Minute CO23 to delete the 3 bullet points in the
pre-amble to be replaced with the undermentioned wording in italics, the
minutes of the Extraordinary meeting held on 4 July 2017 were confirmed as a
correct record and authorised to be signed by the Mayor.
Councillor Chandler
advised the Council:
• this
subject matter had attracted a great deal of interest through consultation
period with very strong and conflicting views expressed on almost all
aspects. This had led to the review of
the spatial strategy from its key starting point – the 65:35 ratio between
Melton Mowbray and the rural areas through to the inclusion of individual
villages as service centres and rural hubs.
There is little prospect of satisfying everyone’s aspirations but we
remain convinced that the distribution within the last version of the plan was
fair and justified and we do not propose a fundamental change in
direction. However there is always room
for improvement and it is in all of our interests to develop and improve the
plan where we can;
• the
report addresses some of those issue and identifies some key improvements we
can make. It clarifies the balance
between Melton and the rural area and our expectations of how the development
will take place. Importantly, it
addresses one of the issues that caused the greatest criticism in the last
consultation to rework the village allocation so that we can avoid the need of
redistribution between villages. This is
possible because the work on sites – item 3E – has brought forward a better
range of sites and in turn a closer fit to the approach of allocations it is
based upon, allocating based on population size;
• on
a new approach to SS3 unallocated sites: stepping away from prescriptive limits
which would be hard to justify and may not stand the test of time. A new approach is proposed as a focused
change which would allow a responsive approach to be taken on 3;
• a
judgement based on need and impact not a tick box approach based on fixed
numbers. Improving the review clauses in
SS6 so that they are more precise and inclusive of the options available;
• the
recommendation is to note the differences between the significant focused
changes; recommendations parts 2 and 3 are less important modifications where
it is proposed we take the opportunity to improve the text of 4, 5 and 6.
(2) the minutes of
the ordinary meeting held on 19 July 2017 were confirmed as a correct record
and authorised to be signed by the Mayor.
Report author: Lena Shuttlewood
Publication date: 11/10/2017
Date of decision: 11/10/2017
Decided at meeting: 11/10/2017 - Council
Accompanying Documents: