Venue: Parkside, Station Approach, Burton Street, Melton Mowbray LE13 1GH
Contact: Democratic Services
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Minutes: Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Glancy, Higgins and Holmes. |
|
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST PDF 85 KB Members to declare any
interest as appropriate in respect of items to be considered at this meeting. Minutes: A
personal interest in respect of County Councillor Orson was noted as being on
record for any matter which related to Leicestershire County Council. Councillor
Posnett declared a personal interest in relation to Minute Number 34 and due to
the location of her property she would not take part in the debate or vote on
the item. (At
6:33pm, after the consideration of this item, Councillor Posnett left the
meeting and did not return.) |
|
CABINET RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL PDF 171 KB To receive a report
and recommendations from Cabinet in relation to approval of the financial
implications associated with the Staged Payment Agreement with Leicestershire County
Council (LCC) to Support Infrastructure Investment and enable the County
Council to secure the HIF grant from Homes England. Additional documents: Minutes: The
Leader introduced and moved the recommendations in the report. In doing so, the
Leader summarised the situation which was by agreeing to contribute the sum of
£1.75m towards infrastructure costs in Melton, it would enable Leicestershire
County Council (LCC) to enter into a Grant Determination Agreement (GDA) with
Homes England for the Housing Infrastructure Fund grant. Members were reminded
that by not entering into the Staged Payment Agreement (SPA) with LCC, LCC
would not enter into the GDA with Homes England and
that this would jeopardise the forward funding of the southern section of the
Melton Mowbray Distributor Road (MMDR). Members
were also informed that the Council has a long-standing commitment to support
the development of the MMDR and the SPA would support LCC in their efforts to
deliver this scheme. The successful delivery of the scheme would also support
growth and investment in Melton Mowbray which underpins Melton’s Local Plan. The
Council was warned that as the SPA would represent a significant investment by
the Authority, it must be accepted that resources might have to be removed from
other priorities and that difficult decisions would have to be made in future
given the ongoing financial challenge. During
the debate the following points were noted: ·
It
was recognised that the agreement had taken a long time to negotiate and that
an outcome of this should be closer collaboration between Melton Borough
Council and LCC in the future. ·
In
the context of the £160m infrastructure investment planned, the £1.75m is a
modest contribution towards the scheme but a significant contribution for
Melton Borough Council, however if it secures delivery of the MMDR then it is a
necessary one. ·
A
Member commented that despite some concerns, the arrangement should be
supported because it would be beneficial to Melton Mowbray. The alternative
would be unacceptable. ·
Members
put on record their thanks to all Members and Officers
who have worked on securing the arrangement. Under
Chapter 3, Part 1, Section 17.5, Councillors Orson, Browne and de Burle
requested that a recorded vote take place on the recommendations. RESOLVED That
Council 1.
Noted and endorsed the decision taken by Cabinet to enter
into a Staged Payment Agreement with Leicestershire County Council (subject to
Council approving the necessary provision is made in the Capital Programme). 2.
Noted that the agreement will fund a contribution by the
Borough Council towards the costs incurred by the County Council in the
provision of education infrastructure arising from housing associated with the
construction of the MMDR South. 3.
Approved the financial implications arising from the
agreement by making provision in the Capital Programme for a
number of staged payments to the sum of £1.75m (initially funded by
borrowing and subject to indexation as set out in the financial implications of
the report). The
above resolution was voted for as follows: For
the Motion (23) Bains,
Bindloss, Browne, Carter, Chandler, Child, Cumbers, de Burle, Douglas, Evans,
Faulkner, Fisher, Freer, Graham, Hewson, Illingworth, Lumley, Orson, Pritchett,
Smith, Steadman, Wilkinson, Wood. Against ... view the full minutes text for item CO34 |