Venue: Parkside, Station Approach, Burton Street, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire. LE13 1GH
Contact: Democratic Services 01664 502579
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Minutes: There were no apologies for absence. |
|
To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 30 October 2019. Minutes: The minutes of the meeting
held on 30 October were confirmed and authorised to be signed by the Chair. |
|
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST PDF 51 KB Members to declare any
interest as appropriate in respect of items to be considered at this meeting. Minutes: Councillors Orson and Pearson each declared an interest in any items relating to Leicestershire County Council, due to their roles as County Councillors. |
|
MATTERS REFERRED FROM SCRUTINY COMMITTEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SCRUTINY PROCEDURE RULES There are no items for consideration. Minutes: No items had been referred from Scrutiny Committee in accordance with the Scrutiny Procedure Rules. |
|
DRAFT TENANCY AGREEMENT PDF 133 KB The Portfolio Holder for Housing and Communities to submit a report seeking Cabinet approval to consult stakeholders on a draft tenancy agreement. Additional documents: Decision: Having considered the content of the draft Tenancy Agreement, Cabinet APPROVED the commencement of the consultation. Minutes: Councillor Alan Pearson, Portfolio Holder for Housing and Communities introduced the report, the purpose of which was to seek Cabinet approval to consult stakeholders on a draft Tenancy Agreement. Councillor Pearson gave a summary of the report, highlighting that a robust Tenancy Agreement would underpin a transparent and efficient Housing Improvement Plan and help to facilitate good housing and positive relationships with tenants. The draft Agreement, which had been subject to engagement with the Tenants Forum Executive Committee (TFEC) and benchmarked against those of other councils, set out the responsibilities of the Council and its tenants. All current tenants would be involved in the forthcoming Consultation on the draft Agreement. During discussion the following points were noted: ·
This
issue was a high priority for the Council and formed part of improving the
Council’s housing service. ·
The
content of the draft Tenancy Agreement was robust but the formatting needed to be
corrected to ensure the page numbers corresponded to those stated on the
contents page. ·
To
encourage tenant compliance with the Agreement (specifically the principles
detailed at section 8 of the draft Agreement, relating to anti-social
behaviour) and support the Council’s protection of others, the term of all new
tenancies would be for an initial 12 months.
Providing tenants had complied with their responsibilities, as detailed
within the Agreement, they would transition to secure tenancies. Current law and regulations, as well as the
Council’s procedure of consultation, written warnings, Housing Officers
intervention would also support this. ·
Tenancies
and applications for tenancies had to be considered on a case by case
basis. The content of this Agreement
gave the Council robust management of its tenancies. It enabled the Council to refuse applications
from those with a history of anti-social behaviour and provided a framework for
court proceedings against non compliance of tenants. ·
It was
important to ensure that Leicestershire County Council met their agreed
obligations to vulnerable people and this Council. Discussions would take place on a case by
case basis. DECISIONS (KEY
DECISION) Having considered the content of the draft Tenancy Agreement, Cabinet APPROVED the commencement of the consultation. Reasons for decisions: The Tenancy Agreement would assist officers in appropriately managing tenancies, with particular regard to rent collection, antisocial behaviour and providing tenants with information regarding their rights and responsibilities whilst living in their home. The proposed agreement would allow officers to effectively enforce the conditions of the agreement whilst providing additional reassurance to tenants that their agreement with the Council was relevant and continued to uphold their rights. |
|
BUDGET MONITORING 2019/20 QUARTER 2 - APRIL TO SEPTEMBER PDF 196 KB The Portfolio Holder for Corporate Finance and Resources to
submit a report providing financial progress information on the General Fund
and Special Expenses for period 1 April 2019 to 30 September 2019. Additional documents: Decision: Cabinet NOTED the year end forecast and financial position for the General Fund and Special Expenses at 30 September 2019. Minutes: Councillor Ronnie de Burle, Portfolio Holder for Corporate Finance and Resources introduced the report, the purpose of which was to provide financial progress information on the General Fund and Special Expenses for period 1 April 2019 to 30 September 2019. Councillor de Burle gave a summary of the report,
highlighting that this provided information on the forecasted outturn for the
Council’s Corporate, People and Place service areas. In addition to quarterly reporting of the
budget position to Cabinet, monthly reporting at Strategic Leadership Team
meetings ensured that any early warnings of financial pressures could be
identified and resolved. Councillor de Burle highlighted the charts at paragraph 6.1 of the report, which predicted i. General Fund overspends of £13k on the People Portfolio and £79k on the Place Portfolio and an underspend of £55k on the Corporate Priorities Portfolio, which amounted to a predicted net overspend of £36k. ii. Special Expenses underspend of £31k. Referring to the Planning Application Fees shortfall of £115k, as detailed at Appendix A of the report, the Director for Corporate Services advised that since writing the report the shortfall had increased and a potential issue had been flagged. Further discussions were taking place in respect of this. There were no comments or questions from Members. DECISIONS (NON-KEY) Cabinet NOTED the year end forecast and financial position for the General Fund and Special Expenses at 30 September 2019. Reason for decision: The Council, having set a Budget at the start of the financial year, needed to ensure the delivery of this Budget was achieved. Consequently there was a requirement to regularly monitor progress so corrective action could be taken when required which was enhanced with the regular reporting of the financial position. |
|
HOUSING REVENUE ACCOUNT - BUDGET MONITORING - 1 APRIL 2019 TO 30 SEPTEMBER 2019 PDF 150 KB The Portfolio Holder for Corporate Finance and Resources to submit a report providing information on actual expenditure and income incurred on the Housing Revenue Account (HRA), compared to the latest approved budget for the period 1 April 2019 to 30 September 2019. Additional documents: Decision: Cabinet NOTED the financial position on the Housing Revenue Account to 30 September 2019 and the year end forecast. Minutes: Councillor Ronnie de Burle, Portfolio Holder for Corporate Finances and Resources introduced the report, the purpose of which was to provide information on actual expenditure and income incurred on the Housing Revenue Account (HRA), compared to the latest approved budget for the period 1 April 2019 to 30 September 2019. Councillor de Burle
gave a summary of the report, advising that receipt of the formal business plan
for the HRA in January 2020, would enable a more constructive review. There was a large budget in place but due to
maintenance and development projects not being taken forward as planned there
was an underspend of £198,917, as at the end of September. However, there was a potential overspend of
£106k predicted for year end. The Director for
Corporate Services advised that the Chief Executive, the Director for Growth
and Regeneration and herself had authorised expenditure in line with the
Housing Improvement Plan which would amend the authorised budget and
expenditure. There remained other areas
where expenditure was needed and weekly meetings with the Finance Section were
held on this. Further information would
be provided to Members in the coming months. During discussion the following point was noted: ·
The
income shortfall due to the loss of rent for void properties prompted comment on the use of the Housing
Revenue Account to pay council tax on these properties and if the removal of
this discount should be reconsidered. DECISIONS (NON-KEY) Cabinet NOTED the financial position on the Housing Revenue Account to 30 September 2019 and the year end forecast. Reason for decision: The Council, having set an agreed Budget at the start of the financial year, needed to ensure the delivery of this Budget was achieved. Consequently there was a requirement to regularly monitor progress so corrective action could be taken when required which was enhanced with the regular reporting of the financial position. |
|
CAPITAL PROGRAMME MONITORING TO 30 SEPTEMBER 2019 PDF 97 KB The Portfolio Holder for Corporate Finance and Resources to submit a report providing financial progress information on the Capital Programme for period 1 April 2019 to 30 September 2019. Additional documents:
Decision: Cabinet NOTED the financial position on the Capital Programme to 30 September 2019 and the year-end forecast. Minutes: Ronnie de Burle, the Portfolio Holder for Corporate Finance and Resources introduced the report, the purpose of which was to provide financial progress information on the Capital Programme for period 1 April 2019 to 30 September 2019. Councillor de Burle gave
a summary of the report, highlighting that monitoring of actual capital
expenditure against authorised expenditure was undertaken on a regular basis
and reported to Senior Leadership Team.
Appendices A to D of the report gave details of the spending against
budget for all projects up to 30 September 2019. The General Fund forecasted position was to
spend all capital project monies for 2019/20 by year end. The HRA forecasted position was an underspend
by year end. The forthcoming HRA
business plan would inform the spend and budget setting process going forward. During discussion the following points was noted: ·
The
forecasted underspend on the public conveniences was welcomed by Members. ·
Ensuring
the Council had a good quality telephony system in place was vital to providing
excellent customer service. The
telephony upgrade would support this. DECISIONS (NON-KEY) Cabinet NOTED the financial position on the Capital Programme to 30 September 2019 and the year-end forecast. Reason for decision: The Council, having set an agreed Budget at the start of the financial year, needed to ensure the delivery of this Budget was achieved. Consequently there was a requirement to regularly monitor progress so corrective action could be taken when required which was enhanced with the regular reporting of the financial position. |
|
MID YEAR REPORT ON THE TREASURY MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AND PRUDENTIAL INDICATORS 2019/20 PDF 98 KB The Portfolio Holder for Corporate Finance and Resources to submit a report providing a summary of the treasury activities to the end of September 2019 and covering the actual position to date on the Prudential Indicators in accordance with the Prudential Code. Additional documents: Decision: (1) Cabinet REFERRED the mid-year position on treasury activity for 2019/20 to Council for noting; (2) Cabinet REFERRED the mid-year position on the prudential indicators for 2019/20 to Council for approval; (3) Cabinet RECOMMENDED to Council that a new Treasury Management Provision Reserve be established from 2019/20, with delegated authority given to the Director for Corporate Services to determine the affordable amount to contribute into this each year during the statutory override period. Minutes: Councillor Ronnie de Burle, Portfolio Holder for Corporate Finance and Resources introduced the report, the purpose of which was to provide a summary of the treasury activities to the end of September 2019 and cover the actual position to date on the Prudential Indicators, in accordance with the Prudential Code. Councillor de Burle
gave a summary of the report, highlighting the increasing interest rate
forecasts at section 3.2 of Appendix A of the report, which had implications
for borrowing. The Council’s borrowing
was £33.413m. This figure had not
changed since the beginning of the year. Councillor de Burle
confirmed that as a result of good management the Council’s investment
portfolio had risen and the gross budgeted investment return was predicted at
£365k and increase over that budgeted at £223k, which was an encouraging
position. However, the underlying
economic environment remained difficult for the Council. During discussion the following point was noted: ·
The
budget and the Treasury Management strategy were approved together each
year. The current strategy had a
difference of approximately £7m between how much the Council was able to borrow
(operational limit) how much it currently had. There is also a higher
authorised limit. These were internally
imposed limits which ensured that all borrowing was in line with that budgeted
and expected in line with financial plans.
The Borrowing threshold could be increased if necessary as long as this
was in line with the financial plans of the Council. DECISIONS (NON-KEY) (1) Cabinet REFERRED the mid-year position on treasury activity for 2019/20 to Council for noting; (2) Cabinet REFERRED the mid-year position on the prudential indicators for 2019/20 to Council for approval; (3) Cabinet RECOMMENDED to Council that a new Treasury Management Provision Reserve be established from 2019/20, with delegated authority given to the Director for Corporate Services to determine the affordable amount to contribute into this each year during the statutory override period. Reasons for decision: The Treasury Management Code required the Council to provide a mid-year update on Treasury Management activities to the Council. It was a requirement that Treasury Management performance was scrutinised during the year which fell within Cabinet’s remit. To facilitate the decision making process and support capital investment decisions the Prudential Code requires the Council to agree and monitor a minimum number of prudential indicators. |
|
INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH LEICESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL PDF 134 KB The Leader of the Council to submit a report presenting the basis for a significant infrastructure funding agreement. Decision: (1) Cabinet SUPPORTED the principles of an infrastructure funding agreement with Leicestershire County Council and RECOMMENDED to Council that this Council enter into an Infrastructure Funding Agreement; (2) Cabinet RECOMMENDED to Council that delegated authority be granted to the Chief Executive, in consultation with the Leader, the Director for Governance and Regulatory Services and the Director for Corporate Services to negotiate the terms of the legal agreement with the County Council; (3) Cabinet RECOMMENDED to Council that delegated authority be granted to the Director for Governance and Regulatory Services to complete the associated legal documentation. Minutes: Councillor Joe Orson, the Leader of the Council introduced the report, the purpose of which was to present the basis for a significant infrastructure funding agreement. Councillor Orson gave
a summary of the report, highlighting that this issue had a huge impact for the
community, both socially and economically.
The external funding contributions for the northern and eastern sections
of the road had been secured and this report also set out the detailed funding
for the southern section. During Discussion the following points were noted: ·
Members
thanked officers for the work they had undertaken and specifically for the
advice provided on this project, which was quite technical at times. ·
The
distributor road was a high priority for the Council. Leicestershire County Council was an
important partner and this was a good agreement. Section 106 funding would enable affordable
housing, educational allowances, green space and additional facilities for the
community. ·
The
wording at paragraph 6.4 of the report, relating to the Council contributing
50% of New Homes Bonus provided by new homes delivered as a consequence of the
road, was very general and the formula and modulus underpinning this would be
specific. Approximately £4k out of the
£6k new homes to be built would be subject to this principle. ·
Subject
to approval, at tomorrow’s Planning Committee meeting a significant
contribution of £4.5million towards the project will be realised. The northern,
eastern and southern sections of the road would be delivered as one project,
forward funded by Leicestershire County Council. DECISIONS (KEY
DECISION) (1) Cabinet SUPPORTED the principles of an infrastructure funding agreement with Leicestershire County Council and RECOMMENDED to Council that this Council enter into an Infrastructure Funding Agreement; (2) Cabinet RECOMMENDED to Council that delegated authority be granted to the Chief Executive, in consultation with the Leader, the Director for Governance and Regulatory Services and the Director for Corporate Services to negotiate the terms of the legal agreement with the County Council; (3) Cabinet RECOMMENDED to Council that delegated authority be granted to the Director for Governance and Regulatory Services to complete the associated legal documentation. Reasons for decisions: The proposal recognises the Council’s aspirations to facilitate sustainable growth within Melton and that significant infrastructure is required to support delivery of the approved Local Plan. Melton Borough Council has been a key partner in promoting and supporting the delivery of the relief road and the proposal enables the Council to make a significant financial contribution to future infrastructure costs; using the proceeds of growth, whilst protecting and ensuring the council’s future financial viability. The proposal takes into account the financial pressure and risks on this Council’s finances and proposes an affordable solution which also demonstrates its commitment to working proactively with the County Council to achieve mutually beneficial objectives. |
|
AWARD OF CONTRACTS UNDER THE HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PLAN PDF 127 KB The Portfolio Holder for Housing and Communities to submit a report asking Cabinet to endorse the award of contracts which have been put in place in order to initiate an expeditious response to the Internal Audit Report on Landlord Health and Safety. Decision: Cabinet ENDORSED the award of contracts. Minutes: Councillor Joe Orson, the Leader of the Council introduced
the report, the purpose of which was to ask Cabinet to endorse the award of
contracts, which had been put in place in order to initiate an expeditious
response to the Internal Audit report on Landlord Safety. Councillor Orson gave a summary of the report, highlighting
that the approval requested was retrospective, due to the Council’s immediate
action in response to Internal Audit’s report on landlord health and
safety. The contracts were vital for the
implementation of key actions, identified by the report to achieve compliance. The Director for
Growth and Regeneration advised that consultants had been appointed and work
had started due to urgency. There were no comments or questions from Members. DECISIONS (KEY
DECISION) Cabinet ENDORSED
the award of contracts. Reason for decisions: To seek retrospective approval for the award of contracts taken as an immediate response to the landlord health and safety report. |
|
NEW FINANCE SYSTEM APPROVAL PDF 140 KB The Portfolio Holder for Corporate Finance and Resources to submit a report seeking Cabinet approval to award a new finance system contract and recommend to Council the approval of the necessary funding to support the implementation. Additional documents:
Decision: (1) Cabinet AUTHORISED the award of the contract for a new finance system to the chosen supplier; (2) Cabinet DELEGATED authority to the Director for Governance and Regulatory Services to draft and/or finalise any necessary legal documentation; (3) Cabinet RECOMMENDED to Council the approval of £250k to be allocated from the Corporate Priorities Reserve in order to fund this project. Minutes: Councillor Ronnie de Burle, Portfolio Holder for Corporate
Finance and Resources introduced the report, the purpose of which was to seek
Cabinet approval to award a new finance system contract and recommend to
Council the approval of the necessary funding to support the implementation. Councillor de Burle gave a summary of the report,
highlighting that the Council’s current financial system was no longer suitable
for business needs and a procurement process had been put in place to acquire a
new system. This would be a major cost
to the Council but was vital to enabling financial procedures and processes to
be undertaken ie invoicing, debt recovery etc. ‘Supplier A’ was the Council’s preferred
provider due to cost, quality and the ability to interface with neighbouring
councils. The total implementation cost
could be reduced through in-house support.
Once the system was implemented, there would be an annual saving of £15k
in maintenance and licensing. During discussion the following points were noted: ·
The Council would not be able to continue
without replacing the system once it moved into being unsupported. This would effect the council’s ability to
carry out debt collection, invoicing, and
financial transactions. ·
The proposed solution was a good system at a
good price. ·
Clarification was sought on the length of the
contract and the Director for Corporate Services provided the information that
this was a five year contract with an option to extend for five years. ·
Members requested the that Project Benefits and
Outcomes, as detailed at paragraph 6.4 of the report be clearly set out for
Members at the Council meeting on 18 December ie what
did improved reporting capabilities and improved debt management functionality
mean in practical terms. DECISIONS (KEY
DECISION) (1) Cabinet
AUTHORISED the award of the contract
for a new finance system to the chosen supplier; (2) Cabinet
DELEGATED authority to the Director
for Governance and Regulatory Services to draft and/or finalise any necessary
legal documentation; (3) Cabinet
RECOMMENDED to Council the approval
of £250k to be allocated from the Corporate Priorities Reserve in order to fund
this project. Reasons for decisions: The Council had undertaken a full procurement process which identified the chosen supplier as the preferred bidder against the award criteria. |