The report on the General Fund Revenue Budget 2024/25 and Medium Term Financial Strategy 2025/26 to 2027/28 is to be presented to the Committee, prior to final consideration by Cabinet and Council in February 2024.
Please note that
Appendix E (Parish Council Precepts) is not available. This appendix will be
available for the Council meeting in February.
Minutes:
The Director for Corporate Services (Section 151 Officer),
Dawn Garton, introduced the report with a presentation.
A concern was raised that as there is a lot of information
in the paper for Members to consider, the job of Scrutiny is difficult. Members
recognised the link between the Corporate Strategy and Budget, but it would be
better if they were done separately. It was explained that it was time to renew
the Corporate Strategy and that it usually wouldn’t be presented every year. In
addition, Officers take Members through the budget process throughout the year
and that it is discussed at the State of Melton Debate and there is the Budget
Scrutiny Workshop in December as well. Members were also provided the
opportunity to raise any further queries with the Director for Corporate
Services outside of the meeting.
Members Allowances was raised. It was explained that there
is due to be an independent review in 2024/25 but that the annual uplift had
been provided for in the budget.
The backlog of service charging at Pheonix House and the
concern over whether the occupiers know it is coming was raised. It was
explained that Officers have discussed the issue with occupiers and that they
are aware of the process. The building has been surveyed and the charges will
be divided accurately. Officers confirmed that there will be an accrual at year
end, and it will go in the current year accounts. It was also highlighted that
the Council will also be considering the new Asset Management Plan which
demonstrates the significant progress that the Corporate Asset team has made
over the last year.
A concern was raised in relation to the increasing charges
at Thorpe Road Cemetery, as well as the repairs that need doing and the
remaining number of plots. It was clarified that work preparing to increase
capacity at the current cemetery has progressed, but the work has not yet been
undertaken. It was noted that the Special Expenses Budget is a small budget and
that the increase in fees is necessary to help mitigate the rising costs.
Concern was raised over the spend on consultants around
projects. The Chief Executive clarified there was not significant use of
consultants but confirmed that there will be occasions where using external
technical expertise is necessary, especially in areas the Council doesn’t have
in-house expertise.
Members raised the issues of the car parking assessment and
whether external resources were required for that. It was explained that this
was a legacy commitment and that there is no proposed budget allocated to the
task. What there is, is a commitment to review options for new car parking
technology which does not require additional resources.
A Member raised concern that there is a lot of red on the
risk register. In response it was explained that finance is a high risk,
especially post covid, with rising inflation, reduced income and decreasing
government grants but that the Council’s finances are under control and there
had not been a deterioration from previous years. That said, Members were
informed that local government finances as a whole remain fragile and that the
SLT maintain constant oversight on the financial position and that the Council
can in no way be complacent. It was also highlighted that while the current
budget was not proposing any significant cuts, there was no guarantee that this
may not be required in 12 months’ time.
Parking charges on evenings and Sundays was raised and the
concern that this would conflict with the objective of getting more people into
the town centre. It was explained that fees and charges were due to be approved
under delegation and that no other car parking charges had been increased.
Members gave thanks to Officers on the work done during the
budget setting process.
RESOLVED
That Members’ comments are presented to Cabinet at the
next Cabinet meeting.
Supporting documents: