In accordance with the Scrutiny Procedure Rules, the following items have been referred from the Scrutiny Committee:
· Scrutiny
Feedback on the Regulatory Change in Housing
· Scrutiny
Feedback from the Tenants' Engagement Session
Decision:
· Scrutiny feedback on the Regulatory Change in Housing
Cabinet AGREED to have regard to the Scrutiny Committee’s feedback.
· Scrutiny feedback from the Tenants’ Engagement Session
Cabinet AGREED to have regard to the Scrutiny Committee’s feedback.
Minutes:
In accordance with the Scrutiny Procedure Rules, the
following items had been referred from the Scrutiny Committee:
Scrutiny feedback on the Regulatory Change in Housing
The Chair of the Scrutiny Committee, Councillor Mike Brown,
introduced the report advising Members that Scrutiny had received a report on
the regulatory change in housing at their meeting held on 25 April 2024. In
doing so, the Chair of the Scrutiny Committee stated that the Committee were
appreciative of all the work carried out by Officers and that Members were
impressed by the detail presented.
The Scrutiny Committee comments were outlined in the report
for Cabinet’s consideration. The Chair of the Scrutiny Committee did highlight
that there was an issue of a large number of complaints as a result of a
contractor failure however, as the landlord, the Council has a responsibility
in managing contractors and ensuring their work is timely and up to standard.
It was also noted that there was a disparity of how the
Council dealt with complaints and compliments. The Council is very good at
recording complaints but not as good with compliments. Members noted that in
future data would be captured and the Council’s performance benchmarked using
Housemark.
Cabinet AGREED to have regard to the Scrutiny
Committee’s feedback.
Scrutiny feedback from the Tenants’ Engagement Session
The Chair of the Scrutiny Committee, Councillor Mike Brown,
introduced the report advising Members that Scrutiny had facilitated a tenant’s
engagement session, which was held on 25 April 2024. Tenants provided comments
and feedback on the following questions:
· What do you like about living in MBC housing?
· What have been the best changes over recent years?
·
What improvements would
you like to see in next 12 months?
·
What longer term
improvements would you like to see?
·
How could we encourage
greater involvement from other tenants?
The comments and feedback received were presented to Cabinet
for their consideration.
The Chair of the Scrutiny Committee informed Cabinet that
700 tenants were invited to the tenant engagement sessions and therefore the
feedback is a reasonable representation of tenant’s views. It was noted that
amongst the feedback a substantial amount was positive feedback.
Tenants did highlight that there was an issue around
anti-social behaviour, which was raised a couple of times. However, it was
noted that the way it has been addressed was prompt.
The garden policy was mentioned as the better the
environment, the more engaged and committed tenants are.
Members noted that positive contacts need to be collected
more effectively, however the experience was positive and a considerable amount
of feedback was received.
Councillor Cox commented that, in respect to anti-social
behaviour, data needs to be shared more widely in order to tackle the issue.
The main problem is that the Leicestershire Authorities are on different and
outdated systems. There was an agreement to move onto a shared system, however
the system is yet to be procured.
Officers confirmed that there would be a tenant’s summer
social, giving tenants an opportunity to socialise with each other.
Cabinet AGREED to have regard to the Scrutiny
Committee’s feedback.
At 4:49pm, upon the conclusion of this item, Councillor
Brown left the meeting and did not return.
Supporting documents: