The Scrutiny Committee is to receive the Crime and Disorder Annual Report. In addition, Inspector Darren Richardson will also be in attendance for a question and answer session.
Minutes:
The Portfolio Holder for Corporate Finance, Property and Resources and Chair of the Safter Melton Partnership introduced the Crime and Disorder Annual Report.
Inspector Darren Richardson, Neighbourhood Policing Area Commander for Melton and Rutland addressed the Committee and confirmed how the positivity of the partnership and the acquired funding secured had had a very positive and strong effect on the town and the borough. He advised that there had lately been a national deployment of staff due to recent incidents around the country, with Melton police officers being deployed elsewhere nevertheless, as a testament to the partnership within the town, there had still been a reduction in violent crime and public disorder. Inspector Richardson confirmed that all deployed officers are now back in Melton.
Inspector Richardson advised how the Police had set up a Safety
Advisory Group (SAG) with the Parish Councils, in respect of the recent
festivals that had been held in the Vale.
The SAG had been successful, as it had been working alongside the
community to ensure there was no anti-social behaviour and noise pollution. He
advised that this style of support would continue with other events over the
coming year.
During the discussions, a Member asked if the
Activity Bus from StreetVibe would be returning to
Melton after March 2025, it was advised that it would be dependent on
additional funding and Melton would have to apply again for the bus to be
deployed here be it through StreetVibe or another
organisation that would offer a similar service.
The Portfolio Holder for
Corporate Finance, Property and Resources and Chair of the Safter Melton
Partnership advised members that the Police and Crime Commissioner had just
completed his own consultation on how to use the funding going forward and had
recognised that councils would be better able to tailor projects to their own
communities and hopefully this would be introduced into his plan going forward.
A Member queried how effective Fixed Penalty Notices (FPN) were. In
response it was advised that FPNs had recently been increased in line with
Government guidelines to act as a deterrent and, at Melton, the policy is that
if a FPN is not paid, there would be a prosecution. Consideration is being
given to community pay back, especially for the under 16’s, though the national
action plan for this is not yet in force.
It was advised that there are other deterrents in place for persistent
offenders for example a Community Protection Order which would remain in place
for 12 months and if breached could lead to a custodial sentence.
A Member asked how many people get a visit when a crime is reported as
it has been commented on social media that when crimes are reported no Police
Officer comes out to attend. In response, Members were informed that the Police
work with the Victims’ Code, which is a system that identifies a victim of
crime and any vulnerabilities. The code states that an identified victim of
crime should expect some form of contact by police within 24 hours, depending
on the severity of the crime some victims will receive an in-person visit and
some victims will receive a phone call. The Police would continue with 28-day
updates and Officers would immediately contact the victim if there were
significant updates. The preference in communication is decided by the victim.
The Victims’ Code will soon be made statutory.
Concern was raised regarding the Police taking 24 hours to visit a
victim, especially if the perpetrator is on the premises. In response, Members
were informed that each response is graded, and an emergency response is within
15 minutes. It was recognised that geographically, it can be difficult but that
neighbouring areas can send an officer in an emergency.
In following up, the question was asked on whether helicopters can be
deployed to pursue perpetrators who have left the scene. In response, it was
confirmed that helicopters can are still deployed but not as often, as it costs
£15k each time. The helicopter is a regional resource which is mainly deployed
for safeguarding situations such as a missing highly vulnerable person. Drones
are deployed more often for both missing people and crimes in progress.
It was noted that the burglary rate in Melton is low and averages about
one a week.
It was reiterated that the public need to be encouraged to report all
crime and not just post about it on social media where it escalates with no
clarification if the crime had been reported. There is a Mobile Independent
Advisory Group in the community which feeds into the Police what has been
raised in the communities and on social media, what is being discussed or
complained about and this information is actioned by the Police, where
appropriate.
A Member commented that they are seeing a lot of posts from Police
Officers on social media about their daily performances, e.g. number of
arrests, and would rather the Police spend their time on their duties instead.
In response, it was recognised that there would always be a debate on how the
Police are best to engage with residents via social media. Some Officers decide
to update the public via social media, whilst others prefer to just sort crime
out, but the key is to get the balance between keeping the public informed and
using the time to do police work.
Members all agreed the Ring doorbells idea was good but asked if other
areas of the Borough were to be considered and not just the town centre. In
response, the Committee were informed that the Council were bound due to
funding conditions, however, we are due to receive another 400 units, and these
would be distributed throughout the Borough.
There was reference to prison leavers and the role of the Council. In
response, Members were advised that there is a Prison Release Protocol and the Council is part of a regional network which
is part of the East Midlands Council, where briefings take place and the
Council is then informed of: forthcoming prisoner releases, the locations where
people are being released and the dates. This will then prepare the teams to
understand where any pressures could be and support
and arrangements could be put in place.
In terms of early release, Inspector Richardson stated that he isn’t
involved in how prisoners are selected but that a factor would be the type of
crime they committed, therefore the dangerous prisoners are less likely to be
selected for early release.
A comment was made that
it was encouraging to hear of work being actioned on the issue of fly tipping
but queried on what is the strategy across the Borough. In response it was
noted that historically there was a disconnect between the rural community and
the Council but with some work, there is now a strong line of communication.
This has led to fly tipping being reported more and in turn the community have
felt they are being listened to.
It was recognised that the team has done a good job but the KPIs don’t
reflect this. It isn’t easy to prove that the Council is getting value for
money. In response it was stated that KPIs are set at a national level. The
government have changed the way that they record FPNs. There is no
consideration on the size of the Borough or the number of issued and paid.
Members noted that setting targets can lead to increased costs. The real
measure is digging more and understanding the themes.
Members requested whether they could report incidences and register
queries directly to a Police Officer, as opposed to using the form, as the form
is clunky and doesn’t always provide the best responses. The Committee was
informed that Police Officers’ email addresses are on the website, therefore they
can be contacted directly. Inspector Richardson stated that he is happy for
Members to contact him directly but that, due to his workload, a response won’t
be instant.
Following a query, Members were informed that the introduction of the knives
amnesty had been successful. There is a bin at the Police Station, in which
people can come and drop knives into.
The Committee welcomed the neighbourhood links initiative that that
PCSOs have been undertaking. It was recognised that this is a good way for the
Police to communicate with residents.
The Chair reminded the Committee that Melton Mowbray and the Borough
isn’t an unsafe place but that doesn’t mean that it is safe
at all times. There is a lot of good work done by the Council, the
Police and Partners in order to make the town and
Borough safe.
Supporting documents: