Recreation
Area, Melton Road, Asfordby Hill
Minutes:
Applicant: Andrew
Granger & Co. Ltd
Location: Recreation
Area, Melton Road, Asfordby Hill
Proposal: Outline
application for the development of 14 dwellings with associated vehicular
access and public open space.
(a) The Regulatory Services Manager stated that this
application seeks outline planning permission with all matters reserved except
for access.
The site is partially open space and overgrown allotments.
The proposal would provide 14 dwellings and a play area larger than the existing
play area. The provision of the new access would require the relocation of the
existing bus stop. There is no objection from the Highway Authority.
There are no technical objections to the application and is
proposed for development in the emerging Neighbourhood Plan. It does not feature
in the emerging Local Plan. The Neighbourhood Plan can be given considerable
weight because it is a post – examination plan, which will soon be subject to a
referendum.
Recommend that permission is granted subject to a section 106 and conditions as reported.
(b) Cllr de Burle, head of the
Parish Council, was invited to speak and stated that:
·
Support application
·
Key element to neighbourhood plan submission
·
Provision for traffic calming measure on
approach road of Melton side
· Tidies up area of woodland
·
(c) Adam Murray, the agent, was invited to speak and stated
that:
·
14 new houses including affordable housing
·
In the context of surrounding properties
·
Public open space
·
Sympathetic to existing amenity
·
Sustainable
·
Benefits outweigh harm
·
Improves open space provision
·
Sufficient space for enhanced play area
·
Tidies up overgrown area
·
Allocated for residential development
· Supported by range of technical consultees
·
(d) Cllr Sheldon, the ward councillor, was invited to speak
and stated that:
·
Stanton Road properties have suffered from water
flooding
·
Treatment of concrete and SUDs is a concern
· If the bus stops are relocated past the boundary they are the responsibility of Melton
·
The Regulatory Services Manager stated that drainage is
covered by condition 7. The bus stops will be relocated in a safe, appropriate
position regardless of boundary. Highways Authority do not refer to any traffic
calming measures.
Cllr Chandler
proposed to permit the application and stated that it is a good
scheme provided the conditions are adhered to.
Cllr Posnett seconded
the proposal to permit and stated that the relocation of the bus stop is
necessary as the traffic is bad at the roundabout.
A vote was taken and it was unanimously decided that the application should be approved.
DETERMINATION: PERMIT
subject to:
(i)
The conditions as set out in the report and;
(ii) The completion
of an s106 agreement as set out in the report
For the following
reasons:
The application seeks
outline consent for a residential development of 14 dwellings and a new area of
public open space. Approval is sought for the access into the site and the
principle of residential development. It is considered that the application
presents a balance of competing objectives and the Committee is invited to
reconcile these in reaching its conclusion.
The site is
considered to perform reasonably well in terms of access to
facilities and
transport links, particularly to Melton Mowbray.
While the site is not
allocated for development in the pre-submission local plan, it is accepted that
Asfordby Hill is a reasonably sustainable location
for residential development and that at this stage the local plan can only be
given limited weight.
The Asfordby Parish Neighbourhood Plan should now be given
considerable weight as it is a post examination plan which will soon be the
subject of a referendum.
In conclusion it is
considered that, on the balance of the issues, there are significant benefits
accruing from the proposal when assessed as required under the guidance in the
NPPF in terms of housing supply and affordable housing in particular. This is
also an opportunity to increase and improve the area and quality of the public
space and play area. The balancing issues – loss of woodland and impact upon
neighbours – are considered to be of limited harm.
Supporting documents: