Field 1357, Melton Road, Waltham on the Wolds
Minutes:
Applicant: MHB
Planning Ltd
Location: Field
1357, Melton Road, Waltham On The Wolds
Proposal: Reserved
Matters application for 45 dwellings.
(a) The Head of
Strategic Planning and Regulatory Services stated that:
• The application was for reserved
matters pursuant to outline permission
• The applicant is aware of concerns
regarding the use of stone and has sought the Committee’s guidance in this
regard
• He highlighted the areas of the
application that have been the subject of contention, particularly where it
adjoins houses on Melton Road.
(b) Martin Lusty, on behalf of Waltham on the
Wolds Parish Council, was invited to speak and stated that:
• Clarified that the Parish Councils
letter in July wasn’t specifically an objection. Generally in support of the
application and want to see the houses built and be an asset to the village.
• Raised some
issues and a number of them have been addressed.
• Still
concerns regarding the aesthetics and road safety.
• Would prefer stone instead of
substitute products. Disagree with the mix of brick and stone. Should be 100%
in stone.
• There is a requirement for road
safety traffic calming within the site but would like to see some outside of
the site.
• Speed watch data and recent activity
show that drivers are still exceeding the speed limit.
• A speed indicator was proposed years
ago but hasn’t happened because of funding. Could this be funded by this
scheme?
• Concerns
regarding the junction.
A Cllr asked for clarification regarding the speed indicator
and it was confirmed that it is the type of board which flashes with the speed
at which you are travelling.
The Chair commented that almost one third of the current
dwellings in the village are rendered or brick with no stone.
Mr Lusty confirmed that he was aware but that had been due
to bad planning decisions in the past. Some of those houses are inconsistent
with a conservation village.
The Head of Strategic Planning and Regulatory Services
advised Members that with regards to the junction there were plans to adjust
the width of road, relocate the central island and contributions to a beacon crossing.
Although Waltham contains a Conservation Area, it is not the whole village and
doesn’t include this site. In his opinion, insistence on stone seems
unjustified for some parts of the site.
A Cllr raised concerns regarding the use of stone and insisted
all houses at the front of the development should be 100% stone. They also had
concerns regarding the width of the road and road safety.
The Chair reminded Members that the Ward Cllr can be
involved in the process regarding materials used.
Cllr Holmes proposed
approval of the application and noted that the houses would all look
different anyway however there were still concerns regarding road safety. Asked
if the Planning Officer could liaise with applicant regarding their concerns.
The Chair noted that the access/junction had previously been
granted at outline and that they were now dealing with reserved matters.
Cllr Holmes added to her proposal requesting speed monitoring signs and for the entrance to be widened if possible.
The Head of Strategic Planning and Regulatory Services
responded that they would try and open dialogue with applicant and reminded
Members that access is not part of the application. They would be unable to
pursue signs at this stage. The access road is a formal 2 way road that can
accommodate 2 cars and has pavements either side.
Cllr Rhodes seconded
the proposal and actioned planning officers to try to facilitate an
improved access to the site. He supports that action being taken but understood
it can’t be a condition.
A Cllr asked if the play area is equipped.
The Head of Strategic Planning and Regulatory Services
stated that there is a S106 which states that the play area will be equipped
and maintained.
A Cllr asked what percentage of the houses would be stone
and the Chair noted that the Ward Cllr will be involved regarding the building
materials used.
A vote was taken and the Members voted unanimously to
permit.
Determination:
(i) PERMIT, subject to the conditions as
set out in the report
(ii) That
discharge of the external materials is delegated to the Head of Strategic
Planning and Regulatory Services in consultation with the Ward Member.
Supporting documents: