Grange Farm House, Harby Lane, Hose
Minutes:
Applicant: Stroud And Son - George Stroud
Location: Grange Farm House, Harby Lane, Hose
Proposal: Proposed
Residential Development for 35 Houses.
(a) The
Development Manager (LP) stated that:
Members will recall that the application was deferred at the
meeting of 15th November 2018 in order to invite the submission of
an amended red line plan, as the ‘red line’ plan submitted did not accord with
the site allocation plan in the Local Plan.
The Parish Council has also made a Section 106 contribution
request in relation to play equipment which is to be located in the village
park adjacent to the primary school. There has also been additional
information submitted in relation to Long Clawson surgery which demonstrates
compliance with the CIL Regulations and the request can be legitimately
including is a Section 106 agreement.
Following the deferral a revised plan has been
submitted. The plan remains as a slight variation from the site
allocation due to the current access point being included. It is
considered that the additional area could not be developed as it forms an
existing access road to Hose Grange.
It is considered that the minimal variation from the site allocation is acceptable and the proposal is recommended for approval subject to conditions and updated section 106 contributions as set out in the report.
(b) Maurice Fairhurst,
Agent to the Applicant was invited to speak and stated that:
·
Northern
boundary was the only concern previously. Since then, amended plans have been
submitted.
·
Application
boundary follows the allocation apart from the access onto Harby Lane.
·
Highways
would like one entrance for both the farm and housing development.
·
All
matters reserved apart from access.
A Cllr queried
whether the issues relating to access had been advised to Cllrs previously.
Mr Fairhurst confirmed it was, and that the problem was that
the northern boundary extended too far. He explained it wasn’t on the proposal
until Highway suggested that access.
A Cllr asked
whether the report had changed since the last meeting.
The Chair confirmed
that it remained the same.
A Cllr questioned
talk of the s106 in the previous meeting regarding play equipment.
Mr Fairhurst replied the applicant was happy to provide the
play area but wasn’t sure about whether it’d be equipped as they’d had a
request from the Parish Council to contribute to existing play area.
Cllr Rhodes stated that had there not been a
defect in the last committee, he would’ve recommended to permit, and was happy
to propose.
Cllr Baguley seconded.
A Cllr questioned
whether a play are could be conditioned in line with policy.
The Chair asked
Cllr Rhodes if he was happy to include.
Cllr Rhodes
disagreed. He reiterated that the Parish Council had requested money for the
play area in accordance with what people wanted.
The Assistant
Director of Strategic Planning and Regulatory Services stated it was either
solution, depending on discretion.
A vote was taken. 9 Members voted to permit.
1 Member voted to abstain.
Application approved.
Determination: The site is allocated for
development in the adopted Melton Local Plan. The application is in outline and
demonstrates how this allocation can be fulfilled, including the site specific
criteria applied by the Plan. No
material considerations are present which indicate the decision should depart
form the development plan.
Supporting documents: