King Edward VII Upper School, Burton Road, Melton Mowbray
Minutes:
Applicant: Jelson Ltd:- Rob Thorley
Location: King
Edward VII Upper School, Burton Road, Melton Mowbray
Proposal: Proposed
construction of 120no. residential dwellings plus associated highway
infrastructure and car parking provision. Reserved Matters to include Access,
Appearance, Layout and Scale - Landscaping subject to subsequent separate
application. (Outline application - 13/00877/OUT)
(a) The Development Manager (LP)
presented the report and stated that:
The application seeks approval of the reserved
matters application following the granting of application 13/00877/OUT located
for development of 12 dwellings as MEL2 within the adopted Local Plan.
Following on from committee site visits there are a
number of updates,
The density of the development is 24 per hectare.
Materials have been conditioned to be submitted as
part of the outline permission however the agent has confirmed that they would
look to use predominantly traditional red brick and tile to reflect the
retained school buildings.
The footpath link was the subject of an application
a few years ago to make it a formal public right of way. This went to appeal at which an inspector
rejected the application because use had been permitted and controlled in
association with the school, not by right of way. The agent has confirmed that the proposal is
to re-open the link once development is complete and this was also a
requirement specified by the Council and forms condition 20 of the approved
outline application
The housing mix has been confirmed at 30 affordable
units of which 18 are for rent and 12 for shared ownership of which up to 6 may
be discount market units. The
concentration of affordable units have been broken up and re-distributed as
part of amendments made during the application process.
3 additional objections have been reived since the
publication of the report which raise concern over the felling of trees,
housing mix, location of bungalows, loss of privacy, noise from pumping station
and the pedestrian link to meadow way, these points are all considered within
the report.
It is considered that the development brings
forward a reasonable mixture of housing which would contribute to identified
needs and provides 30 affordable homes, the proposal is one that is allocated
for housing in the Local Plan and therefore is recommended for approval.
(b) Helen Glancy, an objector,
was invited to speak and stated that:
·
Security concerns
·
Queries on maintenance
·
Fly tipping, anti-social behaviour concerns if woodland is
accessible
·
Sewer concerns
·
Wildlife concerns
A Cllr asked what wildlife is present in the woodland.
Ms Glancy stated that there are foxes, squirrels, birds, pheasants,
among others.
A Cllr asked if this was a bad area.
A Cllr clarified that there had been occurrences of anti-social
behaviour in the past and this may return with open access.
The Development Manager stated that condition 7 requires fencing for
security. Majority of the trees will be retained, and there will be a removal
of poor species which will be replaced. The location of the pumping station has
been driven by the position of the existing sewer and will be largely screened.
The Assistance Director of Strategic Planning and Regulatory Services
stated that access will be restricted by fencing. The sewer essentially denotes
a ‘no build zone’, and the maintenance of the site will be undertaken by a
management company.
(c) Rob Thorley, the applicant,
was invited to speak and stated that:
·
Allocated land
·
Sustainable brownfield site
·
Restoration of school buildings
·
Currently derelict and decaying
·
Bungalows incorporated into scheme
·
Mix of units including affordable housing
·
Complies with Local Plan
·
In keeping with area
·
Woodland will be fenced off and bounded by gardens
·
Management company will maintain
A Cllr asked if the woodland will be completely fenced off or if
someone will have access.
Mr Thorley stated that access will be given for maintenance and the
local nursery will be able to use it for educational purposes, but otherwise
there will be no access.
The Chair stated that he didn’t want the maintenance of the site to be
forgotten about.
A Cllr asked if the footpath will be open.
The Development Manager explained that the change of ownership will
allow the footpath to be reintroduced.
A Cllr had concerns that the footpath was closed due to anti-social
behaviour and this may occur again.
A Cllr asked what materials would be used and if they would reflect the
school buildings.
The Development Manager stated that a condition for materials is to be
submitted.
A Cllr stated that it is a shame to lose the field for recreational
purposes and another space needs to be found for this in the south of Melton.
The Chair proposed to permit
the application.
Cllr Faulkner seconded the
proposal to permit.
A vote was taken. It was unanimously decided that the application be
permitted.
Determination: PERMIT,
subject to the conditions as set out in the report.
REASONS: The proposed development is
considered acceptable and within the parameters established at the outline
stage. The proposal would secure a high standard of design and ensure
satisfactory amenity for future and existing occupiers. The proposal is considered to comply with the
Local Plan policies and principles of the NPPF.
Supporting documents: